H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marie Pinterova vs Maria Teresa Nasuelli H2H: 4-0
Marie Pinterova holds a 4–0 lead over Maria Teresa Nasuelli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marie Pinterova leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Marie Pinterova won the 1980 Monte Carlo fourth round 6-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 1980* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-2 (ret.) | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1974* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-3 6-0 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1969* | Palermo | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 2-6 8-6 6-0 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1969* | Reggio Calabria | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Maria Teresa Nasuelli | — | — | — | 1,622 | 66 | 98 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marie Pinterova | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |