H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marie Pinterova vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 1-1
Marie Pinterova and Pilar Vasquez are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on clay, while Marie Pinterova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marie Pinterova won the 1981 Mahwah second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1981* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Marie Pinterova | 6-1 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1981* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Pilar Vasquez | 6-4 6-4 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marie Pinterova | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |