H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marie Pinterova vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 0-1
Tory Ann Fretz holds a 1–0 lead over Marie Pinterova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tory Ann Fretz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tory Ann Fretz won the 1969 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 83
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-2 6-0 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marie Pinterova | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |