H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Marion Bartoli vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 2-0
Marion Bartoli holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2012 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-3 6-2 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2012* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-0 6-3 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marion Bartoli | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |