H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Jill Craybas H2H: 7-1

Marion Bartoli holds a 7–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 7–0 on hard courts, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2010 Osaka quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marion Bartoli
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 16, 2010* Osaka WTA 250 QF Hard Marion Bartoli #16 6-1 6-2 Jill Craybas #106 Match data
Mar 11, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Marion Bartoli #16 6-2 6-0 Jill Craybas #83 Match data
Oct 5, 2006* Japan Open WTA 500 R32 Hard Marion Bartoli #22 6-2 3-6 6-4 Jill Craybas #60 Match data
Sep 28, 2006* Seoul WTA 250 R32 Hard Marion Bartoli #24 6-4 6-1 Jill Craybas #57 Match data
Aug 10, 2006* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Marion Bartoli #26 6-2 6-0 Jill Craybas #51 Match data
Jun 23, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jill Craybas #85 6-1 6-4 Marion Bartoli #27 Match data
Jan 7, 2005* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Marion Bartoli #41 2-6 6-0 6-1 Jill Craybas #59 Match data
Aug 28, 2004* Forest Hills WTA 250 R16 Hard Marion Bartoli #50 7-6(3) 6-2 Jill Craybas #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,996 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 5 2 8
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,666 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,800 0 3 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,873 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,809 0 3 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,882 0 5 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,820 0 5 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,907 0 7 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,814 0 7 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,808 1 8 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1