H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Jill Craybas H2H: 7-1

Marion Bartoli holds a 7–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 7–0 on hard courts, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2010 Japan Women's Open quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marion Bartoli
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main-draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marion Bartoli #16 6-1 6-2 Jill Craybas #106 Match data Oct 16, 2010* QF Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marion Bartoli #16 6-2 6-0 Jill Craybas #83 Match data Mar 15, 2010* R32 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Marion Bartoli #22 6-2 3-6 6-4 Jill Craybas #60 Match data Oct 5, 2006* R32 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marion Bartoli #24 6-4 6-1 Jill Craybas #57 Match data Sep 28, 2006* R32 Korea Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marion Bartoli #26 6-2 6-0 Jill Craybas #51 Match data Aug 10, 2006* R32 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Jill Craybas #85 6-1 6-4 Marion Bartoli #27 Match data Jun 23, 2005* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Marion Bartoli #41 2-6 6-0 6-1 Jill Craybas #59 Match data Jan 7, 2005* R16 ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marion Bartoli #50 7-6(3) 6-2 Jill Craybas #63 Match data Aug 28, 2004* R16 Forest Hills Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,993 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 2 5 8
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,674 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,801 0 3 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,875 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,806 0 3 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,884 0 5 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,815 0 5 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,926 0 7 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,819 0 7 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,802 1 8 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marion Bartoli Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 13 11 24 54.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 21 15 36 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 21 20 41 51.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 37 17 54 68.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 21 20 41 51.2% 14 7 21 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 21 16 37 56.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 34 14 48 70.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 27 14 41 65.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 39 18 57 68.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2012 31 16 47 66.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 277 172 449 61.7% 56 61 117 47.9% 58 25 83 69.9% 11 9 20 55.0% — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 460/663 of Marion Bartoli's and 212/350 of Jill Craybas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marion Bartoli Jill Craybas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 4/41 2.0 3.5 61.8% 57.6% 36.8% 60.4% 56.3% 49.9% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 5/49 1.4 3.6 64.9% 56.3% 43.5% 64.9% 57.5% 51.9% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 9/51 0.8 1.3 69.1% 57.1% 43.5% 51.2% 51.4% 52.7% 48.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 38/73 1.4 2.5 68.5% 60.5% 45.0% 53.5% 47.4% 55.7% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 70/78 1.7 3.1 66.7% 63.9% 44.6% 52.7% 50.5% 57.5% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 54/56 2.0 4.3 62.5% 64.0% 44.4% 47.8% 46.1% 56.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 61/68 2.2 4.3 61.0% 65.9% 45.5% 45.9% 51.9% 58.1% 48.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 51/57 3.3 4.7 59.7% 70.0% 47.7% 48.2% 50.8% 60.8% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 73/86 3.1 4.5 59.0% 68.8% 47.3% 56.8% 53.1% 59.8% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 63/66 2.7 6.7 57.6% 66.8% 43.6% 52.6% 52.1% 56.9% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 32/38 2.3 7.6 58.5% 66.7% 44.0% 55.3% 53.1% 57.5% 46.8% 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0%
Career — 460/669 2.4 4.5 61.8% 65.6% 45.2% 51.8% 50.9% 57.7% 47.0% — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marion Bartoli Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1484 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1512 120.3 — — — — +49 — — 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1637 133.4 -0.70 +0.08 0.819 46.0% +31 -124 -53 48.3% -0.21 6–7 (46%) 8–1 (89%) 105.6 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1674 131.9 -1.04 +1.09 0.984 50.1% +23 -166 -97 58.8% +0.71 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1632 133.1 -1.32 +1.68 1.034 50.8% +17 — -23 55.0% +0.78 5–7 (42%) 2–7 (22%) 94.0 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1801 139.5 -0.51 +0.92 1.028 50.7% +32 -303 -174 60.1% +0.86 11–9 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 +3.77 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11
22 2007 1875 142.0 +2.12 +2.52 1.092 51.8% -79 -152 +82 59.0% +0.72 12–8 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 102.9 +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1807 142.6 +1.65 +1.46 1.045 50.9% +6 -164 +85 56.1% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–3 (75%) 99.2 +2.91 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
24 2009 1885 150.4 +2.39 +4.50 1.163 53.2% +28 -227 -2 67.1% +1.29 14–4 (78%) 6–3 (67%) 110.3 +1.28 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12
25 2010 1815 147.0 +4.48 +1.93 1.161 53.0% +45 -192 +84 63.8% +0.97 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 95.4 +2.32 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2011 1927 155.9 +4.15 +5.80 1.227 54.4% -14 -156 +107 65.1% +1.25 15–6 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -1.14 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19
27 2012 1820 145.9 +1.09 +3.31 1.088 51.8% +54 -143 +153 60.5% +0.76 12–7 (63%) 6–2 (75%) 102.8 +4.07 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70
28 2013 1803 132.3 +1.80 +2.75 1.100 52.3% -34 -141 +327 63.5% +0.66 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 98.6 +1.37 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
Career — 1993 148.0 +2.18 +3.05 1.112 52.3% +12 -176 +67 60.1% +0.77 93–77 (55%) 58–37 (61%) 105.9 +2.62 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.