H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marion Bartoli vs Julia Schruff H2H: 1-1
Marion Bartoli and Julia Schruff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Schruff leads 1–0 on clay, while Marion Bartoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Schruff won the 2007 Acapulco fourth round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2007* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Julia Schruff | 6-0 6-4 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2006* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-2 6-0 | Julia Schruff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,665 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marion Bartoli | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |