H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-1

Marion Bartoli and Lilia Osterloh are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2007 Stanford round of 16 5-7 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marion Bartoli
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilia Osterloh #106 5-7 6-4 6-3 Marion Bartoli #11 Match data Jul 27, 2007* R16 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Marion Bartoli #19 3-6 6-3 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #121 Match data Nov 4, 2006* SF Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,993 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 2 5 8
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,636 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,674 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,801 0 3 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,875 0 3 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,806 0 3 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,884 0 5 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,815 0 5 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,926 0 7 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,819 0 7 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,802 1 8 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marion Bartoli Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 13 11 24 54.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 21 15 36 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2005 21 20 41 51.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2006 37 17 54 68.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2007 21 20 41 51.2% 14 7 21 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2008 21 16 37 56.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2009 34 14 48 70.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 27 14 41 65.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 39 18 57 68.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 31 16 47 66.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 277 172 449 61.7% 56 61 117 47.9% 58 25 83 69.9% 11 9 20 55.0% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 460/663 of Marion Bartoli's and 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marion Bartoli Lilia Osterloh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 4/41 2.0 3.5 61.8% 57.6% 36.8% 60.4% 56.3% 49.9% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 5/49 1.4 3.6 64.9% 56.3% 43.5% 64.9% 57.5% 51.9% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 9/51 0.8 1.3 69.1% 57.1% 43.5% 51.2% 51.4% 52.7% 48.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 38/73 1.4 2.5 68.5% 60.5% 45.0% 53.5% 47.4% 55.7% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 70/78 1.7 3.1 66.7% 63.9% 44.6% 52.7% 50.5% 57.5% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 54/56 2.0 4.3 62.5% 64.0% 44.4% 47.8% 46.1% 56.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 61/68 2.2 4.3 61.0% 65.9% 45.5% 45.9% 51.9% 58.1% 48.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 51/57 3.3 4.7 59.7% 70.0% 47.7% 48.2% 50.8% 60.8% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 73/86 3.1 4.5 59.0% 68.8% 47.3% 56.8% 53.1% 59.8% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 63/66 2.7 6.7 57.6% 66.8% 43.6% 52.6% 52.1% 56.9% 46.9% 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3%
28 2013 32/38 2.3 7.6 58.5% 66.7% 44.0% 55.3% 53.1% 57.5% 46.8% 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0%
Career — 460/669 2.4 4.5 61.8% 65.6% 45.2% 51.8% 50.9% 57.7% 47.0% — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marion Bartoli Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1484 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1512 120.3 — — — — +49 — — 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1637 133.4 -0.70 +0.08 0.819 46.0% +31 -124 -53 48.3% -0.21 6–7 (46%) 8–1 (89%) 105.6 -0.73 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 2004 1674 131.9 -1.04 +1.09 0.984 50.1% +23 -166 -97 58.8% +0.71 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.44 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 2005 1632 133.1 -1.32 +1.68 1.034 50.8% +17 — -23 55.0% +0.78 5–7 (42%) 2–7 (22%) 94.0 +1.61 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 2006 1801 139.5 -0.51 +0.92 1.028 50.7% +32 -303 -174 60.1% +0.86 11–9 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 +3.77 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 2007 1875 142.0 +2.12 +2.52 1.092 51.8% -79 -152 +82 59.0% +0.72 12–8 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 102.9 +1.20 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 2008 1807 142.6 +1.65 +1.46 1.045 50.9% +6 -164 +85 56.1% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–3 (75%) 99.2 +2.91 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 2009 1885 150.4 +2.39 +4.50 1.163 53.2% +28 -227 -2 67.1% +1.29 14–4 (78%) 6–3 (67%) 110.3 +1.28 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2010 1815 147.0 +4.48 +1.93 1.161 53.0% +45 -192 +84 63.8% +0.97 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 95.4 +2.32 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 2011 1927 155.9 +4.15 +5.80 1.227 54.4% -14 -156 +107 65.1% +1.25 15–6 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -1.14 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 2012 1820 145.9 +1.09 +3.31 1.088 51.8% +54 -143 +153 60.5% +0.76 12–7 (63%) 6–2 (75%) 102.8 +4.07 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 2013 1803 132.3 +1.80 +2.75 1.100 52.3% -34 -141 +327 63.5% +0.66 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 98.6 +1.37 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1993 148.0 +2.18 +3.05 1.112 52.3% +12 -176 +67 60.1% +0.77 93–77 (55%) 58–37 (61%) 105.9 +2.62 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.