H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 2-4

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–2 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2008 US Open third round 6-1 7-6(3).

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marion Bartoli #13 6-1 7-6(3) Lindsay Davenport #24 Match data
Mar 14, 2008* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #36 6-2 7-5 Marion Bartoli #10 Match data
Aug 21, 2004* Cincinnati WTA 1000 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 (w/o) Marion Bartoli #56 Match data
May 21, 2004* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Lindsay Davenport #4 7-6(5) 7-5 Marion Bartoli #70 Match data
Mar 23, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Marion Bartoli #87 6-0 (ret.) Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data
Sep 1, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #10 6-3 6-1 Marion Bartoli #231 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,996 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 5 2 8
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,643 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,666 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,800 0 3 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,873 0 3 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,809 0 3 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,882 0 5 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,820 0 5 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,907 0 7 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,814 0 7 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,808 1 8 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54