H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Shahar Peer H2H: 3-7

Shahar Peer holds a 7–3 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 5–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2011 Doha fourth round 6-1 6-0.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 7
10 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 25, 2011* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Marion Bartoli #18 6-1 6-0 Shahar Peer #12 Match data
May 29, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Shahar Peer #18 7-6(7) 6-2 Marion Bartoli #14 Match data
Nov 2, 2009 Tournament of Champions WTA Finals RR Hard Marion Bartoli #12 6-3 6-2 Shahar Peer #31 Match data
Mar 11, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #49 1-6 6-4 7-5 Marion Bartoli #12 Match data
Jun 30, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Marion Bartoli #19 6-3 6-2 Shahar Peer #16 Match data
Oct 26, 2006* Linz WTA 500 R32 Hard Shahar Peer #22 6-3 7-6(4) Marion Bartoli #19 Match data
Aug 18, 2006* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Shahar Peer #25 2-6 7-5 6-4 Marion Bartoli #28 Match data
Oct 6, 2005* Japan Open WTA 500 R32 Hard Shahar Peer #50 6-4 6-4 Marion Bartoli #45 Match data
May 25, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Shahar Peer #84 6-4 6-3 Marion Bartoli #33 Match data
Mar 25, 2005* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #135 2-6 6-4 7-5 Marion Bartoli #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,996 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 5 2 8
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,643 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,666 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,800 0 3 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,873 0 3 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,809 0 3 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,882 0 5 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,820 0 5 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,907 0 7 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,814 0 7 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,808 1 8 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5