H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marion Bartoli vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 0-1
Silvija Talaja holds a 1–0 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2003 Gold Coast third round 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2003* | Gold Coast | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Silvija Talaja | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marion Bartoli | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |