H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 3-3

Marion Bartoli and Tathiana Garbin are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Tathiana Garbin leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2011 Australian Open round of 128 6-0 6-0.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 3
6 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marion Bartoli #17 6-0 6-0 Tathiana Garbin #86 Match data Jan 19, 2011* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tathiana Garbin #71 6-3 7-5 Marion Bartoli #13 Match data May 28, 2009* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Marion Bartoli #17 6-3 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #54 Match data Jan 9, 2009* QF Brisbane International International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marion Bartoli #20 6-2 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #23 Match data Jun 21, 2007* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Tathiana Garbin #59 6-0 2-0 (ret.) Marion Bartoli #42 Match data Sep 17, 2004* R16 Bali Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tathiana Garbin #83 6-3 2-6 6-4 Marion Bartoli #62 Match data Apr 9, 2003* R64 Charleston Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,993 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 2 5 8
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,636 0 0
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,674 0 0
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,801 0 3 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,875 0 3 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,806 0 3 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,884 0 5 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,815 0 5 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,926 0 7 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,819 0 7 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,802 1 8 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marion Bartoli Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2003 13 11 24 54.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2004 21 15 36 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2005 21 20 41 51.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2006 37 17 54 68.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 1 4 5 20.0%
22 2007 21 20 41 51.2% 14 7 21 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
23 2008 21 16 37 56.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 34 14 48 70.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 27 14 41 65.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 39 18 57 68.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2012 31 16 47 66.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 277 172 449 61.7% 56 61 117 47.9% 58 25 83 69.9% 11 9 20 55.0% 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 460/663 of Marion Bartoli's and 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marion Bartoli Tathiana Garbin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 4/41 2.0 3.5 61.8% 57.6% 36.8% 60.4% 56.3% 49.9% 41.0% —/—
19 2004 5/49 1.4 3.6 64.9% 56.3% 43.5% 64.9% 57.5% 51.9% 47.3% —/—
20 2005 9/51 0.8 1.3 69.1% 57.1% 43.5% 51.2% 51.4% 52.7% 48.9% —/—
21 2006 38/73 1.4 2.5 68.5% 60.5% 45.0% 53.5% 47.4% 55.7% 45.6% —/—
22 2007 70/78 1.7 3.1 66.7% 63.9% 44.6% 52.7% 50.5% 57.5% 46.4% —/—
23 2008 54/56 2.0 4.3 62.5% 64.0% 44.4% 47.8% 46.1% 56.5% 45.5% —/—
24 2009 61/68 2.2 4.3 61.0% 65.9% 45.5% 45.9% 51.9% 58.1% 48.7% —/—
25 2010 51/57 3.3 4.7 59.7% 70.0% 47.7% 48.2% 50.8% 60.8% 45.5% —/—
26 2011 73/86 3.1 4.5 59.0% 68.8% 47.3% 56.8% 53.1% 59.8% 49.3% 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0%
27 2012 63/66 2.7 6.7 57.6% 66.8% 43.6% 52.6% 52.1% 56.9% 46.9% 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4%
28 2013 32/38 2.3 7.6 58.5% 66.7% 44.0% 55.3% 53.1% 57.5% 46.8% 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9%
29 —/— 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5%
30 —/— 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5%
31 —/— 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5%
32 —/— 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1%
33 —/— 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3%
34 —/— 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5%
Career 460/669 2.4 4.5 61.8% 65.6% 45.2% 51.8% 50.9% 57.7% 47.0% 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marion Bartoli Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1484 97.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.20
17 2002 1512 120.3 +49 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) -0.04
18 2003 1637 133.4 -0.70 +0.08 0.819 46.0% +31 -124 -53 48.3% -0.21 6–7 (46%) 8–1 (89%) 105.6 -0.73
19 2004 1674 131.9 -1.04 +1.09 0.984 50.1% +23 -166 -97 58.8% +0.71 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.44
20 2005 1632 133.1 -1.32 +1.68 1.034 50.8% +17 -23 55.0% +0.78 5–7 (42%) 2–7 (22%) 94.0 +1.61
21 2006 1801 139.5 -0.51 +0.92 1.028 50.7% +32 -303 -174 60.1% +0.86 11–9 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 +3.77 1998 1476 99.1 +30 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 +0.11
22 2007 1875 142.0 +2.12 +2.52 1.092 51.8% -79 -152 +82 59.0% +0.72 12–8 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 102.9 +1.20 1999 1468 104.0 +69 +4 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2008 1807 142.6 +1.65 +1.46 1.045 50.9% +6 -164 +85 56.1% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–3 (75%) 99.2 +2.91 2000 1619 130.4 -93 +74 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 2009 1885 150.4 +2.39 +4.50 1.163 53.2% +28 -227 -2 67.1% +1.29 14–4 (78%) 6–3 (67%) 110.3 +1.28 2001 1575 127.1 -22 +73 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 2010 1815 147.0 +4.48 +1.93 1.161 53.0% +45 -192 +84 63.8% +0.97 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 95.4 +2.32 2002 1600 121.8 -44 +115 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 2011 1927 155.9 +4.15 +5.80 1.227 54.4% -14 -156 +107 65.1% +1.25 15–6 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -1.14 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92
27 2012 1820 145.9 +1.09 +3.31 1.088 51.8% +54 -143 +153 60.5% +0.76 12–7 (63%) 6–2 (75%) 102.8 +4.07 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 2013 1803 132.3 +1.80 +2.75 1.100 52.3% -34 -141 +327 63.5% +0.66 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 98.6 +1.37 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% 0.0% -6.00 -0.20
Career 1993 148.0 +2.18 +3.05 1.112 52.3% +12 -176 +67 60.1% +0.77 93–77 (55%) 58–37 (61%) 105.9 +2.62 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.