H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marion Bartoli vs Tina Pisnik H2H: 0-1
Tina Pisnik holds a 1–0 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tina Pisnik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2002 Australian Open first round 6-3 4-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tina Pisnik | 6-3 4-6 9-7 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marion Bartoli | Tina Pisnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |