H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Marion Bartoli holds a 1–0 lead over Wing Yau Venise Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marion Bartoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2013 Shenzhen round of 32 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 6-1 6-0 | Wing Yau Venise Chan | Match data | Jan 3, 2013* | R32 | Shenzhen | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,993 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Wing Yau Venise Chan | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marion Bartoli | Wing Yau Venise Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,819 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,802 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 460/663 of Marion Bartoli's and 1/1 of Wing Yau Venise Chan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Marion Bartoli | Wing Yau Venise Chan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2003 | 4/41 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 61.8% | 57.6% | 36.8% | 60.4% | 56.3% | 49.9% | 41.0% | 2013 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 53.1% | 46.2% | 21.7% | 45.5% | 11.1% | 34.7% | 39.2% |
| 2004 | 5/49 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 64.9% | 56.3% | 43.5% | 64.9% | 57.5% | 51.9% | 47.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 9/51 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 69.1% | 57.1% | 43.5% | 51.2% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 48.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 38/73 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 68.5% | 60.5% | 45.0% | 53.5% | 47.4% | 55.7% | 45.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 70/78 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 63.9% | 44.6% | 52.7% | 50.5% | 57.5% | 46.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 54/56 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 62.5% | 64.0% | 44.4% | 47.8% | 46.1% | 56.5% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 61/68 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 61.0% | 65.9% | 45.5% | 45.9% | 51.9% | 58.1% | 48.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 51/57 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 59.7% | 70.0% | 47.7% | 48.2% | 50.8% | 60.8% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 73/86 | 3.1 | 4.5 | 59.0% | 68.8% | 47.3% | 56.8% | 53.1% | 59.8% | 49.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 63/66 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 57.6% | 66.8% | 43.6% | 52.6% | 52.1% | 56.9% | 46.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 32/38 | 2.3 | 7.6 | 58.5% | 66.7% | 44.0% | 55.3% | 53.1% | 57.5% | 46.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 460/669 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 61.8% | 65.6% | 45.2% | 51.8% | 50.9% | 57.7% | 47.0% | Career | 1/1 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 53.1% | 46.2% | 21.7% | 45.5% | 11.1% | 34.7% | 39.2% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Marion Bartoli | Wing Yau Venise Chan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2001 | 1484 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 | 2013 | 1496 | 100.0 | +0.14 | +0.74 | 0.600 | 37.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.24 |
| 2002 | 1512 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.08 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1637 | 133.4 | -0.70 | +0.08 | 0.819 | 46.0% | +31 | -124 | -53 | 48.3% | -0.21 | 6–7 (46%) | 8–1 (89%) | 105.6 | -0.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1674 | 131.9 | -1.04 | +1.09 | 0.984 | 50.1% | +23 | -166 | -97 | 58.8% | +0.71 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.2 | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1632 | 133.1 | -1.32 | +1.68 | 1.034 | 50.8% | +17 | — | -23 | 55.0% | +0.78 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–7 (22%) | 94.0 | +1.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1801 | 139.5 | -0.51 | +0.92 | 1.028 | 50.7% | +32 | -303 | -174 | 60.1% | +0.86 | 11–9 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.0 | +3.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1875 | 142.0 | +2.12 | +2.52 | 1.092 | 51.8% | -79 | -152 | +82 | 59.0% | +0.72 | 12–8 (60%) | 4–6 (40%) | 102.9 | +1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1807 | 142.6 | +1.65 | +1.46 | 1.045 | 50.9% | +6 | -164 | +85 | 56.1% | +0.28 | 8–11 (42%) | 9–3 (75%) | 99.2 | +2.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1885 | 150.4 | +2.39 | +4.50 | 1.163 | 53.2% | +28 | -227 | -2 | 67.1% | +1.29 | 14–4 (78%) | 6–3 (67%) | 110.3 | +1.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1815 | 147.0 | +4.48 | +1.93 | 1.161 | 53.0% | +45 | -192 | +84 | 63.8% | +0.97 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.4 | +2.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1927 | 155.9 | +4.15 | +5.80 | 1.227 | 54.4% | -14 | -156 | +107 | 65.1% | +1.25 | 15–6 (71%) | 7–2 (78%) | 108.8 | -1.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1820 | 145.9 | +1.09 | +3.31 | 1.088 | 51.8% | +54 | -143 | +153 | 60.5% | +0.76 | 12–7 (63%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.8 | +4.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1803 | 132.3 | +1.80 | +2.75 | 1.100 | 52.3% | -34 | -141 | +327 | 63.5% | +0.66 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.6 | +1.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1993 | 148.0 | +2.18 | +3.05 | 1.112 | 52.3% | +12 | -176 | +67 | 60.1% | +0.77 | 93–77 (55%) | 58–37 (61%) | 105.9 | +2.62 | Career | 1500 | 100.0 | +0.14 | +0.74 | 0.600 | 37.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -24.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | 3 | 9 | 12 | Oct 6, 2012 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 6 | 5 | 11 | May 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 8 | 3 | 11 | Jan 16, 2013 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 2 | 9 | 11 | Mar 25, 2011 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 3 | 7 | 10 | Feb 25, 2011 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 3, 2013 | H2H |