H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-1
Marlene Weingartner holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marlene Weingartner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2003 Miami second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2003* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marlene Weingartner | 6-1 6-4 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2001* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Marlene Weingartner | 6-4 7-6(3) | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-2 6-4 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |