H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Anke Huber H2H: 0-3
Anke Huber holds a 3–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2001 Wimbledon second round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Anke Huber | 7-5 6-1 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1999* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anke Huber | 6-0 5-0 (ret.) | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
| Jul 8, 1999* | Portschach | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anke Huber | 6-3 6-3 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Anke Huber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 |