H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Marlene Weingartner vs Anke Huber H2H: 0-3

Anke Huber holds a 3–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 64 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #21 7-5 6-1 Marlene Weingartner #41 Match data Jun 29, 2001* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Anke Huber #20 6-0 5-0 (ret.) Marlene Weingartner #70 Match data Sep 23, 1999* R32 Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Anke Huber #31 6-3 6-3 Marlene Weingartner #70 Match data Jul 8, 1999* R32 Portschach Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marlene Weingartner Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0
15 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2
18 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,510 0 0 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3
19 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,532 0 0 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6
20 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,493 0 0 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7
21 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10
22 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,482 0 0 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10
23 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,645 0 0 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10
24 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,630 0 0 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10
25 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,509 0 0 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12
26 — — — — — — — 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marlene Weingartner Anke Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7%
18 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
19 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
20 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
21 2001 13 17 30 43.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6%
22 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 2003 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3%
24 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0%
25 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
Career — 48 67 115 41.7% 26 43 69 37.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 9 12 25.0% — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marlene Weingartner Anke Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14
15 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — +75 — 27.3% -1.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.10 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06
16 1996 1471 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97
17 1997 1467 106.7 — — — — +25 +97 — 34.8% -1.48 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03
18 1998 1511 116.1 — — — — +6 +47 — 50.0% -0.06 2–0 0–2 — +0.31 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91
19 1999 1533 112.0 — — — — +6 +11 — 34.8% -1.74 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.40 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55
20 2000 1493 99.2 — — — — -1 +8 — 28.3% -1.70 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 +0.79 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78
21 2001 1546 121.6 — — — — -18 +20 +50 45.5% -0.49 8–8 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.9 +0.06 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81
22 2002 1483 114.9 — — — — +47 +8 +62 35.5% -1.16 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 +0.40 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85
23 2003 1646 127.8 -1.25 -1.46 0.767 44.3% +19 -99 -81 48.5% -0.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.63 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86
24 2004 1631 114.1 -1.58 +1.70 0.953 48.5% -17 -24 — 43.1% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -0.71 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51
25 2005 1510 107.7 -1.33 -2.67 0.796 45.2% +66 +24 — 31.3% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.5 -0.27 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22
Career — 1679 119.1 -1.40 -0.52 0.849 46.2% +9 +7 +7 39.8% -0.95 33–27 (55%) 17–21 (45%) 106.9 +0.07 — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.