H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Marlene Weingartner vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-1

Marlene Weingartner holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marlene Weingartner leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2001 Miami second round 6-4 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anne Kremer #31 6-4 5-7 6-3 Marlene Weingartner #67 Match data
Jan 5, 2001* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Marlene Weingartner #87 6-1 6-4 Anne Kremer #33 Match data
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Marlene Weingartner #90 6-2 2-6 6-4 Anne Kremer #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,677 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marlene Weingartner Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,533 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,494 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,483 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,664 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,628 0 0 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,507 0 0 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2