H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Barbara Schett H2H: 1-1
Marlene Weingartner and Barbara Schett are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay, while Marlene Weingartner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2002 Roland Garros first round 6-2 2-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Barbara Schett | 6-2 2-6 6-0 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1997* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marlene Weingartner | 6-0 6-4 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |