H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Marlene Weingartner vs Erika De Lone H2H: 1-0

Marlene Weingartner holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marlene Weingartner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2001 Charleston Open round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marlene Weingartner #63 6-2 6-2 Erika De Lone #139 Match data Apr 18, 2001* R64 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marlene Weingartner Erika De Lone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0
17 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0
18 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,510 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0
19 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,532 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0
20 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,493 0 0 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0
21 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0
22 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,482 0 0 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
23 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,645 0 0 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0
24 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,630 0 0 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0
25 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,509 0 0 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marlene Weingartner Erika De Lone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2001 13 17 30 43.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2003 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 67 115 41.7% 26 43 69 37.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 9 12 25.0% — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marlene Weingartner Erika De Lone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — +75 — 27.3% -1.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1471 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43
17 1997 1467 106.7 — — — — +25 +97 — 34.8% -1.48 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36
18 1998 1511 116.1 — — — — +6 +47 — 50.0% -0.06 2–0 0–2 — +0.31 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39
19 1999 1533 112.0 — — — — +6 +11 — 34.8% -1.74 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.40 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
20 2000 1493 99.2 — — — — -1 +8 — 28.3% -1.70 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 +0.79 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69
21 2001 1546 121.6 — — — — -18 +20 +50 45.5% -0.49 8–8 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.9 +0.06 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52
22 2002 1483 114.9 — — — — +47 +8 +62 35.5% -1.16 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 +0.40 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88
23 2003 1646 127.8 -1.25 -1.46 0.767 44.3% +19 -99 -81 48.5% -0.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.63 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33
24 2004 1631 114.1 -1.58 +1.70 0.953 48.5% -17 -24 — 43.1% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -0.71 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34
25 2005 1510 107.7 -1.33 -2.67 0.796 45.2% +66 +24 — 31.3% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.5 -0.27 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08
Career — 1679 119.1 -1.40 -0.52 0.849 46.2% +9 +7 +7 39.8% -0.95 33–27 (55%) 17–21 (45%) 106.9 +0.07 — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.