H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Janet Lee H2H: 0-1
Janet Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Lee leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 2003 Birmingham second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2003* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Janet Lee | 7-5 6-2 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Janet Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |