H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Marlene Weingartner vs Laura Granville H2H: 0-1

Laura Granville holds a 1–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Granville leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2002 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Granville #134 6-3 6-4 Marlene Weingartner #76 Match data Jun 28, 2002* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marlene Weingartner Laura Granville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
18 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,510 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0
19 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,493 0 0 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0
21 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0
22 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,482 0 0 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0
23 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,645 0 0 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0
24 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,630 0 0 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0
25 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,509 0 0 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marlene Weingartner Laura Granville
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 13 17 30 43.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2003 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 67 115 41.7% 26 43 69 37.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 9 12 25.0% — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 15/76 of Marlene Weingartner's and 71/167 of Laura Granville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marlene Weingartner Laura Granville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/44 1.4 2.8 61.8% 60.8% 50.1% 51.8% 41.7% 56.7% 47.3%
23 2003 5/32 2.2 5.0 57.8% 58.0% 37.5% 44.3% 45.1% 49.6% 38.7% 2004 5/36 1.0 2.4 61.3% 58.6% 50.7% 61.2% 54.8% 55.6% 42.0%
24 2004 6/30 1.5 3.8 60.6% 56.0% 42.2% 52.5% 40.6% 50.6% 47.1% 2005 9/27 1.1 1.6 65.1% 64.3% 53.0% 50.2% 56.4% 60.4% 39.3%
25 2005 4/14 1.5 7.3 55.1% 62.2% 40.5% 50.3% 35.4% 51.9% 38.3% 2006 20/28 1.7 2.6 63.3% 64.3% 46.6% 60.2% 45.3% 58.0% 42.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 23/26 1.8 2.3 67.0% 59.8% 46.1% 58.3% 50.4% 55.3% 40.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 3.0 1.0 73.1% 51.1% 42.9% 43.7% 22.5% 48.9% 30.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 1.5 1.5 56.1% 54.9% 44.4% 29.2% 0.0% 50.3% 29.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 2.0 1.0 58.9% 64.5% 48.8% 33.3% 25.0% 58.0% 30.4%
Career — 15/218 1.7 5.1 58.2% 58.3% 40.2% 49.2% 40.7% 50.6% 41.9% — 71/194 1.6 2.3 64.4% 61.4% 47.8% 55.3% 46.1% 56.6% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marlene Weingartner Laura Granville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — +75 — 27.3% -1.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1471 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1467 106.7 — — — — +25 +97 — 34.8% -1.48 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12
18 1998 1511 116.1 — — — — +6 +47 — 50.0% -0.06 2–0 0–2 — +0.31 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04
19 1999 1533 112.0 — — — — +6 +11 — 34.8% -1.74 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1493 99.2 — — — — -1 +8 — 28.3% -1.70 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 +0.79 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28
21 2001 1546 121.6 — — — — -18 +20 +50 45.5% -0.49 8–8 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.9 +0.06 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79
22 2002 1483 114.9 — — — — +47 +8 +62 35.5% -1.16 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 +0.40 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59
23 2003 1646 127.8 -1.25 -1.46 0.767 44.3% +19 -99 -81 48.5% -0.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.63 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57
24 2004 1631 114.1 -1.58 +1.70 0.953 48.5% -17 -24 — 43.1% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -0.71 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60
25 2005 1510 107.7 -1.33 -2.67 0.796 45.2% +66 +24 — 31.3% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.5 -0.27 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
Career — 1679 119.1 -1.40 -0.52 0.849 46.2% +9 +7 +7 39.8% -0.95 33–27 (55%) 17–21 (45%) 106.9 +0.07 — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.