H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Martina Hingis H2H: 1-2
Martina Hingis holds a 2–1 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2005 Pattaya third round 1-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marlene Weingartner | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2002* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-2 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1999* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-0 6-2 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |