H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Marlene Weingartner vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-0

Marlene Weingartner holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marlene Weingartner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2002 Quebec City round of 16 6-1 6-7(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marlene Weingartner #99 6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 Maureen Drake #105 Match data Sep 20, 2002* R16 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marlene Weingartner Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,510 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,532 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,493 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,482 0 0 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,645 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,630 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,509 0 0 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marlene Weingartner Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2001 13 17 30 43.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2003 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 67 115 41.7% 26 43 69 37.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 9 12 25.0% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marlene Weingartner Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — +75 — 27.3% -1.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1471 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1467 106.7 — — — — +25 +97 — 34.8% -1.48 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20
18 1998 1511 116.1 — — — — +6 +47 — 50.0% -0.06 2–0 0–2 — +0.31 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
19 1999 1533 112.0 — — — — +6 +11 — 34.8% -1.74 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.40 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 2000 1493 99.2 — — — — -1 +8 — 28.3% -1.70 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 +0.79 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 2001 1546 121.6 — — — — -18 +20 +50 45.5% -0.49 8–8 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.9 +0.06 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 2002 1483 114.9 — — — — +47 +8 +62 35.5% -1.16 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 +0.40 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 2003 1646 127.8 -1.25 -1.46 0.767 44.3% +19 -99 -81 48.5% -0.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.63 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 2004 1631 114.1 -1.58 +1.70 0.953 48.5% -17 -24 — 43.1% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -0.71 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2005 1510 107.7 -1.33 -2.67 0.796 45.2% +66 +24 — 31.3% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.5 -0.27 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
Career — 1679 119.1 -1.40 -0.52 0.849 46.2% +9 +7 +7 39.8% -0.95 33–27 (55%) 17–21 (45%) 106.9 +0.07 — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.