H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 1-0
Marlene Weingartner holds a 1–0 lead over Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marlene Weingartner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2001 Charleston fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2001* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Marlene Weingartner | 6-3 6-0 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |