H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Selima Sfar H2H: 0-1
Selima Sfar holds a 1–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Selima Sfar leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Selima Sfar won the 2004 Cincinnati fourth round 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2004* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Selima Sfar | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Marlene Weingartner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Selima Sfar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |