H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Tzipora Obziler H2H: 1-0
Marlene Weingartner holds a 1–0 lead over Tzipora Obziler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marlene Weingartner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2004 Canberra third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 53
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marlene Weingartner | 6-4 7-5 | Tzipora Obziler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tzipora Obziler | #316 | #75 | 393 | 1,629 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Tzipora Obziler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |