H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marta Domachowska vs Julia Vakulenko H2H: 1-1
Marta Domachowska and Julia Vakulenko are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Julia Vakulenko won the 2006 Berlin second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 40
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Julia Vakulenko | 6-4 6-3 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2004* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Marta Domachowska | 7-5 6-0 | Julia Vakulenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Domachowska | #943 | #37 | 1,002 | 1,676 | 67 | 98 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Vakulenko | #979 | #31 | 916 | 1,730 | 51 | 76 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Domachowska | Julia Vakulenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #132 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #73 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #132 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #130 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #65 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #354 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #156 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |