H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marta Domachowska vs Laura Granville H2H: 2-0
Marta Domachowska holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marta Domachowska leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marta Domachowska won the 2006 Memphis quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 40
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2006* | Memphis | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Marta Domachowska | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Granville | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2005* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marta Domachowska | 3-6 6-0 7-6(9) | Laura Granville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Domachowska | #943 | #37 | 1,002 | 1,676 | 67 | 98 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Domachowska | Laura Granville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #73 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #65 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |