H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marta Domachowska vs Ludmila Cervanova H2H: 0-2
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 2–0 lead over Marta Domachowska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ludmila Cervanova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2004 Palermo fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 40
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2004* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 6-4 6-4 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2004* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 7-5 6-2 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Domachowska | #943 | #37 | 1,002 | 1,676 | 67 | 98 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Domachowska | Ludmila Cervanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #73 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #65 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |