H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marta Domachowska vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 1-1
Marta Domachowska and Silvija Talaja are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on clay, while Marta Domachowska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marta Domachowska won the 2004 Seoul quarterfinal 7-6(2) 2-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 40
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2004* | Seoul | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Marta Domachowska | 7-6(2) 2-6 6-0 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2003* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 7-5 6-3 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Domachowska | #943 | #37 | 1,002 | 1,676 | 67 | 98 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Domachowska | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #73 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #65 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |