H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 10-2

Martina Hingis holds a 10–2 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 8–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 US Open round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
10 – 2
12 main-draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #8 6-3 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #33 Match data Sep 1, 2002* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #4 6-1 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #17 Match data Mar 6, 2002 QF Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #4 6-1 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #19 Match data Jan 23, 2002* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #20 Match data Mar 25, 2000* QF Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #2 6-1 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #9 Match data Aug 7, 1999* SF San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #2 6-2 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #15 Match data Feb 7, 1999* F Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Hingis #2 6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #16 Match data Jan 27, 1999* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #6 Match data Oct 11, 1997* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #6 6-4 4-6 7-6 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Sep 27, 1997* SF Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Hingis #2 6-0 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #12 Match data Feb 1, 1997* QF Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Hingis #10 6-1 7-5 Amanda Coetzer #14 Match data Oct 11, 1996* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #18 7-5 4-6 6-1 Martina Hingis #20 Match data Jan 26, 1996* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Amanda Coetzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Amanda Coetzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +20 -97 -268 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.27
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +21 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.78 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -241 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -7 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 1992 1866 153.9 — — — — -32 +15 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99
21 2002 2052 167.3 — — — — +74 +178 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +11 -31 -405 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +96 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +75 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1996 1856 161.8 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
25 2006 2019 166.2 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 1997 2015 167.3 — — — — -44 +102 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54
26 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -218 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.84
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28
Career — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41 — 2053 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -162 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.