H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Anke Huber H2H: 12-1

Martina Hingis holds a 12–1 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 6–0 on hard courts and 3–1 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2001 Miami Open quarterfinal 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
12 – 1
13 main-draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #1 7-5 6-0 Anke Huber #15 Match data Mar 26, 2001* QF Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-2 Anke Huber #11 Match data Jul 4, 2000* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Martina Hingis #2 6-3 6-2 Anke Huber #14 Match data May 5, 2000* SF Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-0 Anke Huber #27 Match data Sep 9, 1999* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 2-6 6-1 Anke Huber #13 Match data Feb 1, 1998* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 7-6 5-7 6-4 Anke Huber #12 Match data Nov 15, 1997* QF Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-0 Anke Huber #11 Match data Aug 9, 1997* QF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #2 6-3 3-6 6-3 Anke Huber #7 Match data Feb 16, 1997* F Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Hingis #2 6-1 5-7 6-2 Anke Huber #8 Match data Feb 1, 1997* SF Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Hingis #9 3-6 6-2 7-6 Anke Huber #4 Match data Oct 19, 1996* SF Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #10 6-2 3-6 6-3 Anke Huber #5 Match data Oct 13, 1996* F Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anke Huber #12 2-6 6-1 6-2 Martina Hingis #17 Match data Nov 10, 1995* R16 Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Hingis #60 6-2 1-6 6-3 Anke Huber #10 Match data May 6, 1995* SF Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10
22 — — — — — — — 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10
23 — — — — — — — 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Anke Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7%
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0%
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
Career — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Anke Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78
21 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51
25 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44
26 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22
Career — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41 — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.