H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 5-0

Martina Hingis holds a 5–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 Australian Open third round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Martina Hingis #4 6-1 6-0 Barbara Rittner #71 Match data
Jan 23, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Martina Hingis #1 7-5 6-1 Barbara Rittner #73 Match data
Apr 3, 1997* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R32 Clay Martina Hingis #1 6-0 6-4 Barbara Rittner #41 Match data
Jan 15, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Martina Hingis #4 6-1 7-5 Barbara Rittner #46 Match data
May 3, 1996* Hamburg WTA 250 R16 Clay Martina Hingis #16 6-2 6-4 Barbara Rittner #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,385 515 126 80.3% 5 18 2 10 8 43
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,826 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 45–15 75.0% #6 2,160 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,321 3 14 — — — — — — —
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,285 5 26 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,314 5 35 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,123 5 38 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,050 5 40 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,020 5 40 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,013 5 42 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,855 5 43 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2