H2H data updated: 2026-11-09 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Catalina Castano H2H: 2-0

Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Catalina Castano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2007 Gold Coast quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Catalina Castano
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #7 6-3 6-1 Catalina Castano #54 Match data Jan 5, 2007* QF Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-0 Catalina Castano #108 Match data May 31, 2001* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis — #1 6,976 2,373 520 128 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Catalina Castano — #35 623 1,702 85 111 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 — — — — — — —
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 — — — — — — —
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 — — — — — — —
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,490 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,514 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,519 0 0
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 2004 5–9 35.7% #113 1,533 0 0
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,659 0 0
26 2007 24–13 64.9% — 1,853 5 43 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,543 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2007 12–21 36.4% #112 1,520 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,504 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,476 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,505 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,515 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,493 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Catalina Castano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 2005 10 7 17 58.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2006 8 13 21 38.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 14 21 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 303 77 380 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 28 46 74 37.8% 56 55 111 50.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/109 of Martina Hingis's and 80/174 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martina Hingis Catalina Castano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/5 1.0 2.0 62.5% 45.7% 38.1% 33.3% 33.3% 42.9% 39.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/14 0.3 3.7 64.4% 45.1% 37.0% 43.9% 46.7% 42.2% 37.8%
25 2006 54/72 1.5 2.3 63.9% 63.4% 52.8% 56.5% 51.8% 59.3% 49.6% 2005 5/40 3.6 2.8 58.6% 61.1% 43.2% 52.7% 40.0% 53.5% 41.1%
26 2007 30/37 1.8 2.5 65.3% 65.3% 49.8% 55.4% 50.1% 59.7% 48.6% 2006 20/47 2.1 2.7 61.3% 58.8% 42.7% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 42.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 22/33 1.5 3.3 62.1% 58.1% 43.9% 50.7% 38.5% 52.8% 41.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 11/15 1.4 3.7 61.4% 61.7% 48.0% 58.5% 56.5% 55.8% 42.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.0 8.5 54.9% 64.2% 38.5% 51.0% 55.0% 52.6% 43.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 9/10 1.4 4.0 63.4% 60.6% 47.4% 45.7% 45.1% 55.5% 46.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 1.7 11.0 60.6% 60.7% 34.9% 51.9% 55.9% 50.8% 46.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 3.0 9.3 55.0% 58.9% 33.8% 42.4% 39.5% 47.8% 46.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/2 0.0 5.0 48.9% 48.9% 46.8% 60.0% 30.8% 47.8% 47.9%
Career — 84/648 1.6 2.3 64.4% 64.1% 51.8% 56.1% 51.2% 59.4% 49.2% — 80/196 1.8 3.9 61.1% 58.8% 43.4% 50.3% 45.8% 52.6% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Catalina Castano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +20 -97 -268 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +21 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -241 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 1999 1484 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 2000 1487 104.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.23
21 2002 2052 167.3 — — — — +74 +178 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 2001 1490 107.2 — — — — +25 +45 — 38.2% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.20
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1514 106.3 — — — — — +72 — 53.3% -0.13 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.40
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1519 101.5 -0.43 -0.17 0.693 41.3% — +60 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.05
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 2004 1534 115.0 -2.87 -1.32 0.653 40.4% -58 +59 — 37.1% -0.97 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.75
25 2006 2019 166.2 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 2005 1659 128.5 -0.94 -1.22 0.884 47.8% -48 +8 — 54.9% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 -0.06
26 2007 1854 149.4 +3.30 +4.02 1.205 54.0% +30 — +143 65.1% +1.35 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 90.1 +1.44 2006 1544 112.6 -3.15 -1.99 0.886 47.4% -44 +184 -90 46.3% -0.27 8–10 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.63
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1520 113.0 -1.65 -1.56 0.883 47.1% -28 +175 — 37.0% -1.11 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1504 112.0 -0.13 -1.61 0.950 49.7% +4 +96 — 40.0% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 91.5 -0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1477 98.1 -1.31 +0.09 0.917 47.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1505 109.3 -0.80 +0.20 1.048 50.9% — +82 — 54.2% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.55
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1519 102.2 +1.09 +0.50 0.951 49.0% — +89 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1515 101.0 -0.68 -1.14 0.894 47.6% — — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1493 99.9 +1.69 -0.59 0.918 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — -0.13
Career — 2373 179.4 +3.60 +4.99 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +2.00 92–58 (61%) 53–29 (65%) 103.4 -2.38 — 1702 118.0 -1.52 -1.28 0.901 47.8% -34 +95 -90 44.6% -0.41 33–39 (46%) 21–21 (50%) 97.4 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.