H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 2-0
Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 Scottsdale quarterfinal 6-4 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2002* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 0-6 6-3 | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-0 | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Daja Bedanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |