H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Fang Li H2H: 1-0
Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 1998 Rome third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1998* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-0 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Martina Hingis | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |