H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 1-1
Martina Hingis and Gabriela Sabatini are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on carpet, while Gabriela Sabatini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 1996 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-4 | Gabriela Sabatini | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-2 6-4 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 |