H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Janet Lee H2H: 1-0
Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 Miami second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2002* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-0 | Janet Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Janet Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |