H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 2-0
Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 1995 Roland Garros first round 2-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
| May 6, 1995* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Martina Hingis | 7-6 6-1 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |