H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 4-0
Martina Hingis holds a 4–0 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2000 WTA Tour Championships fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2000* | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-3 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| May 16, 1999* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-0 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| May 1, 1998* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 7-5 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1995* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |