H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 3-0
Martina Hingis holds a 3–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2001 Los Angeles third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2001* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 7-5 | Lilia Osterloh | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2001* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-4 | Lilia Osterloh | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-2 | Lilia Osterloh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Lilia Osterloh | #1,223 | #41 | 738 | 1,697 | 83 | 138 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Lilia Osterloh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1998 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #79 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #43 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #156 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #119 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #144 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #230 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #237 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |