H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 3-0

Martina Hingis holds a 3–0 lead over Mary Joe Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 1997 Key Biscayne quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 25, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 QF Hard Martina Hingis #2 6-4 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #12 Match data
Jan 26, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Martina Hingis #4 6-1 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #17 Match data
Jan 11, 1997* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Martina Hingis #6 6-3 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,385 515 126 80.3% 5 18 2 10 8 43
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,826 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1996 45–15 75.0% #6 2,160 0 2 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,321 3 14 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,285 5 26 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,314 5 35 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,123 5 38 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,050 5 40 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 — — — — — — — 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,020 5 40 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,013 5 42 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,855 5 43 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7