H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-0

Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2000 Miami Open round of 64 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-4 Maureen Drake #80 Match data Mar 22, 2000* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis — #1 6,976 2,373 520 128 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Maureen Drake — #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 — — — — — — —
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,412 0 0
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,433 0 0
26 2007 24–13 64.9% — 1,853 5 43 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,461 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 303 77 380 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +20 -97 -268 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 1988 1498 102.5 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.22
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +21 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.78 1989 1506 108.3 — — — — +36 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.42
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -241 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 1991 1451 96.2 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 2002 2052 167.3 — — — — +74 +178 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2006 2019 166.2 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +41 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2007 1854 149.4 +3.30 +4.02 1.205 54.0% +30 — +143 65.1% +1.35 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 90.1 +1.44 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1555 130.7 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1503 118.1 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -8 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
Career — 2373 179.4 +3.60 +4.99 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +2.00 92–58 (61%) 53–29 (65%) 103.4 -2.38 — 1587 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -17 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.