H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 2-0

Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Meredith Mcgrath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 1996 Paris Indoor Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Meredith Mcgrath
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #16 6-2 6-2 Meredith Mcgrath #50 Match data Feb 15, 1996* R32 Paris Indoor Open WTA 500 Clay
Martina Hingis #87 3-6 6-2 6-4 Meredith Mcgrath #36 Match data Jan 12, 1995* R32 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis — #1 6,976 2,373 520 128 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Meredith Mcgrath — #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 — — — — — — —
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,517 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,657 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
26 2007 24–13 64.9% — 1,853 5 43 — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,895 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Meredith Mcgrath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1991 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 303 77 380 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 36 43 79 45.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 29 15 44 65.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Meredith Mcgrath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +20 -97 -268 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 1988 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.09
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +21 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.78 1989 1517 113.1 — — — — +51 — +23 34.4% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — +0.61
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -241 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +2 — -93 54.1% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 104.9 -0.50
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 1991 1680 124.7 — — — — +45 — — 44.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.42
21 2002 2052 167.3 — — — — +74 +178 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 1992 1658 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1708 131.5 — — — — -19 — -17 49.1% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 100.0 -0.63
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1768 146.3 — — — — -39 -242 +61 52.9% +0.14 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 110.7 -2.14
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1995 1742 142.6 — — — — +5 -174 — 49.1% +0.21 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.72
25 2006 2019 166.2 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 1996 1917 143.6 — — — — -150 -312 +118 63.9% +0.89 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 105.3 -1.70
26 2007 1854 149.4 +3.30 +4.02 1.205 54.0% +30 — +143 65.1% +1.35 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 90.1 +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1895 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.03
Career — 2373 179.4 +3.60 +4.99 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +2.00 92–58 (61%) 53–29 (65%) 103.4 -2.38 — 1928 144.9 — — — — -13 -243 +39 51.0% +0.12 28–22 (56%) 13–21 (38%) 105.1 -2.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.