H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 3-1
Martina Hingis holds a 3–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 1999 Hilton Head quarterfinal 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1999* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-0 7-6 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1998* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-2 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1997* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1995* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-4 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |