H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 3-1

Martina Hingis holds a 3–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 1999 Hilton Head quarterfinal 6-0 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #1 6-0 7-6 Natasha Zvereva #17 Match data Apr 3, 1999* QF Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data Aug 7, 1998* R16 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 4-6 6-1 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #25 Match data Oct 10, 1997* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Natasha Zvereva #14 6-4 6-4 Martina Hingis #16 Match data Oct 12, 1995* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 393 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,836 0 0
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,805 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1998 34–21 61.8% #16 1,927 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,823 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,732 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,707 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Natasha Zvereva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 70 31 101 69.3% 68 51 119 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Natasha Zvereva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 1986 1575 112.5 — — — — +64 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.83
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 1987 1836 140.6 — — — — -22 -248 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.47
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +20 -97 -268 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 1988 1998 161.3 — — — — -75 -214 -184 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +21 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.78 1989 1805 144.2 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 +0.27
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -241 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 1990 1954 156.9 — — — — -79 -42 -37 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 1991 1912 148.9 — — — — -65 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24
21 2002 2052 167.3 — — — — +74 +178 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 1992 1982 158.4 — — — — -114 +58 +52 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +89 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19
25 2006 2019 166.2 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 1996 1898 147.8 — — — — +44 +38 +90 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77
26 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36 1997 1908 154.8 — — — — +10 +4 +80 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1928 157.5 — — — — -30 -3 +182 60.3% +0.46 6–5 (55%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 -2.91
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1823 141.3 — — — — +4 +2 +266 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.71
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +386 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15
Career — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41 — 2074 160.8 — — — — -23 -14 +52 60.5% +0.69 96–63 (60%) 77–61 (56%) 107.8 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.