H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 6-0

Martina Hingis holds a 6–0 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 4–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2001 Dubai Tennis Championships final 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #13 Match data Feb 25, 2001* F Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-7(2) 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #9 Match data Nov 18, 2000* QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #9 Match data Nov 9, 2000* SF Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #7 Match data Nov 13, 1999* SF Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 4-6 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #11 Match data Oct 16, 1999* SF Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #2 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #23 Match data Feb 15, 1997* QF Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Nathalie Tauziat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Nathalie Tauziat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) — -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) — -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.45 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) — -2.67 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.79 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.66
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) — -3.02 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.28
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.01 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.09
21 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.76 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) — -2.99
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.16
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) — -2.67
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.30
25 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) — -3.22 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.82
26 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.36 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.62
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.26
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) — -1.06
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) — -0.76
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.49
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) — +4.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) — +2.32
Career — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41 — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.