H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 2-0

Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 1997 Key Biscayne round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #2 3-6 6-3 6-2 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Mar 22, 1997* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #18 4-6 6-1 6-4 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Sep 3, 1995* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 — — — — — — —
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.