H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Rita Grande H2H: 3-0

Martina Hingis holds a 3–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2001 Miami Open round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Rita Grande
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-2 Rita Grande #54 Match data Mar 23, 2001* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-0 6-3 Rita Grande #62 Match data Jan 24, 2001* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-2 7-5 Rita Grande #46 Match data Feb 7, 1998* QF Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis — #1 6,976 2,373 520 128 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Rita Grande — #24 1,020 1,755 173 220 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Rita Grande
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 — — — — — — —
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1996 10–16 38.5% #71 1,617 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,667 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,581 0 0
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,677 0 0
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 2000 16–22 42.1% #77 1,608 0 0
26 2007 24–13 64.9% — 1,853 5 43 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,640 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Rita Grande
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 1991 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1995 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 15 9 24 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2001 28 16 44 63.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 12 15 27 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 13 16 18.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 303 77 380 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 110 122 232 47.4% 37 56 93 39.8% 15 24 39 38.5% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Rita Grande
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 1991 1471 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +20 -97 -268 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +21 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.78 1993 1456 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -241 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 1994 1492 108.7 — — — — +66 — — 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.41
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 1995 1591 131.2 — — — — +49 — — 47.1% +0.26 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 100.8 +0.32
21 2002 2052 167.3 — — — — +74 +178 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 1996 1618 126.6 — — — — +22 -164 -67 42.4% -0.41 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.9 +0.05
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1668 136.8 — — — — +21 -160 — 48.7% -0.33 4–10 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 97.9 +0.01
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1582 124.9 — — — — +28 -90 -22 37.0% -1.12 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 103.0 -0.30
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1999 1678 125.6 — — — — +23 -179 -106 50.0% -0.45 10–2 (83%) 5–2 (71%) 110.9 -0.74
25 2006 2019 166.2 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 2000 1608 123.6 — — — — +28 -76 -44 43.9% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.6 -0.24
26 2007 1854 149.4 +3.30 +4.02 1.205 54.0% +30 — +143 65.1% +1.35 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 90.1 +1.44 2001 1742 138.0 — — — — +31 -163 -198 54.7% +0.35 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 101.8 +0.27
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1641 120.5 — — — — -19 -46 -67 44.1% -0.36 8–7 (53%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.02
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1534 112.1 +0.28 +0.94 1.123 52.5% -41 +90 +57 40.7% -0.78 6–9 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.70
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1536 104.3 -0.87 -1.71 0.916 47.8% -71 +57 +70 44.6% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 100.9 +1.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1518 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22
Career — 2373 179.4 +3.60 +4.99 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +2.00 92–58 (61%) 53–29 (65%) 103.4 -2.38 — 1755 128.5 -0.35 -0.51 1.007 50.0% +13 -66 -50 45.2% -0.40 63–69 (48%) 38–41 (48%) 101.0 +1.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.