H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 3-0
Martina Hingis holds a 3–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 Indian Wells second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-0 6-1 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-2 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
| May 10, 2000* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Silvija Talaja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |