H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Anne Smith H2H: 21-1

Martina Navratilova holds a 21–1 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 14–0 on carpet and 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1991 Chicago quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova

USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H

21 – 1

22 main-draw meetings

Anne Smith

USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

.mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle { display: none; } .mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle + .mobile-filter-details__fields { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; }

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Martina Navratilova #3	6-1 6-2	Anne Smith	Match data	Feb 16, 1991*	QF	Chicago	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Carpet
Martina Navratilova #2	6-2 6-3	Anne Smith	Match data	Jun 29, 1990*	R64	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Martina Navratilova #2	6-4 6-2	Anne Smith	Match data	Feb 19, 1990	QF	Washington Open	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Carpet
Martina Navratilova #2	6-3 6-2	Anne Smith	Match data	Nov 4, 1989*	SF	Worcester	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova #1	6-2 6-1	Anne Smith	Match data	May 3, 1985*	R16	Houston	WTA 250	Clay
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-1	Anne Smith	Match data	Dec 10, 1982*	QF	Australian Open	Grand Slam	Grass
Martina Navratilova	6-4 6-3	Anne Smith	Match data	Mar 24, 1982	SF	WTA Finals	WTA Finals	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-1 6-1	Anne Smith	Match data	Feb 13, 1982*	QF	Kansas City	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-2 7-6	Anne Smith	Match data	Jan 23, 1982*	QF	Seattle	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-3	Anne Smith	Match data	Jan 4, 1982	F	Washington Open	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-2	Anne Smith	Match data	Oct 31, 1981*	QF	Porsche Tennis Grand Prix	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	7-5 6-4	Anne Smith	Match data	Sep 11, 1981*	QF	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-1	Anne Smith	Match data	Jan 31, 1981*	QF	Chicago	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-3 6-1	Anne Smith	Match data	Jan 15, 1981*	R32	Kansas City	WTA 250	Carpet
Anne Smith	4-5 (ret.)	Martina Navratilova	Match data	Aug 14, 1980*	R16	Canadian Open	WTA 500	Hard
Martina Navratilova	6-4 6-4	Anne Smith	Match data	Jul 19, 1980*	QF	Montreal	WTA 250	Hard
Martina Navratilova	6-0 6-1	Anne Smith	Match data	Aug 18, 1979*	QF	Richmond	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-2	Anne Smith	Match data	Aug 4, 1979*	QF	San Diego	WTA 500	Hard
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-1	Anne Smith	Match data	Feb 24, 1979*	QF	Detroit	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-1 6-2	Anne Smith	Match data	Feb 3, 1979*	QF	Chicago	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-3 6-4	Anne Smith	Match data	Jan 11, 1979*	R32	Oakland	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-0 6-4	Anne Smith	Match data	Oct 7, 1978*	QF	Phoenix	WTA 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Martina Navratilova	#395	#1	290	2,680	1,419	228	86.2%	18	3	8	38	100	167
Anne Smith	—	—	—	2,051	221	173	56.1%	0	0	0	0	3	3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Martina Navratilova							Anne Smith
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	1972	0–1	0.0%	—	1,483	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	17–17	50.0%	—	1,741	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	34–20	63.0%	—	1,960	0	1	1977	8–3	72.7%	—	1,634	0	1
18	1975	82–22	78.8%	#3	2,246	0	5	1978	14–7	66.7%	—	1,776	0	2
19	1976	41–16	71.9%	#4	2,166	0	7	1979	28–28	50.0%	—	1,849	0	2
20	1977	67–15	81.7%	#3	2,250	0	13	1980	21–21	50.0%	—	1,866	0	2
21	1978	78–9	89.7%	#1	2,433	1	24	1981	36–25	59.0%	—	1,936	0	2
22	1979	91–12	88.3%	#1	2,439	2	34	1982	27–19	58.7%	—	1,899	0	2
23	1980	86–12	87.8%	#3	2,366	2	45	1983	11–9	55.0%	—	1,898	0	2
24	1981	90–15	85.7%	#3	2,423	3	55	1984	1–2	33.3%	—	1,874	0	2
25	1982	85–3	96.6%	#1	2,538	5	70	1985	10–4	71.4%	—	1,900	0	3
26	1983	84–1	98.8%	#1	2,638	8	86	1986	8–13	38.1%	—	1,718	0	3
27	1984	78–2	97.5%	#1	2,649	11	99	1987	15–9	62.5%	—	1,785	0	3
28	1985	84–5	94.4%	#1	2,595	13	111	1988	8–8	50.0%	—	1,777	0	3
29	1986	84–3	96.6%	#1	2,633	15	125	1989	10–6	62.5%	—	1,850	0	3
30	1987	56–8	87.5%	#2	2,527	17	129	1990	16–14	53.3%	—	1,827	0	3
31	1988	70–7	90.9%	#2	2,455	17	138	1991	8–5	61.5%	—	1,821	0	3
32	1989	68–8	89.5%	#2	2,425	17	146	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	52–7	88.1%	#3	2,322	18	152	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	53–9	85.5%	#4	2,321	18	157	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	38–8	82.6%	#5	2,328	18	161	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	46–8	85.2%	#3	2,265	18	166	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	33–14	70.2%	#8	2,073	18	167	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
45	2002	1–1	50.0%	—	2,051	18	167	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
47	2004	1–4	20.0%	#388	1,940	18	167	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
48	2005	0–1	0.0%	#395	1,910	18	167	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Martina Navratilova																	Anne Smith
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
15	1972	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	0	2	2	0.0%	15	11	26	57.7%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	1	3	4	25.0%	16	4	20	80.0%	10	6	16	62.5%	7	7	14	50.0%	1977	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	5	0	5	100.0%
18	1975	25	7	32	78.1%	25	7	32	78.1%	9	3	12	75.0%	23	5	28	82.1%	1978	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	5	4	9	55.6%
19	1976	10	4	14	71.4%	1	2	3	33.3%	14	2	16	87.5%	16	8	24	66.7%	1979	9	6	15	60.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	11	13	24	45.8%
20	1977	17	6	23	73.9%	10	1	11	90.9%	9	3	12	75.0%	31	5	36	86.1%	1980	7	5	12	58.3%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	2	4	50.0%	8	11	19	42.1%
21	1978	20	4	24	83.3%	2	1	3	66.7%	13	0	13	100.0%	43	4	47	91.5%	1981	7	4	11	63.6%	4	5	9	44.4%	9	5	14	64.3%	16	11	27	59.3%
22	1979	14	3	17	82.4%	4	1	5	80.0%	14	2	16	87.5%	59	6	65	90.8%	1982	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	8	4	12	66.7%	17	13	30	56.7%
23	1980	18	5	23	78.3%	9	0	9	100.0%	12	4	16	75.0%	47	3	50	94.0%	1983	5	2	7	71.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	6	6	12	50.0%
24	1981	14	2	16	87.5%	11	3	14	78.6%	21	4	25	84.0%	44	6	50	88.0%	1984	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
25	1982	12	1	13	92.3%	15	0	15	100.0%	21	1	22	95.5%	37	1	38	97.4%	1985	—	—	—	—	2	3	5	40.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—
26	1983	22	0	22	100.0%	12	1	13	92.3%	19	0	19	100.0%	31	0	31	100.0%	1986	3	5	8	37.5%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	4	7	42.9%
27	1984	17	0	17	100.0%	16	0	16	100.0%	27	1	28	96.4%	18	1	19	94.7%	1987	8	4	12	66.7%	—	—	—	—	5	4	9	55.6%	2	1	3	66.7%
28	1985	24	3	27	88.9%	14	1	15	93.3%	29	0	29	100.0%	17	1	18	94.4%	1988	7	6	13	53.8%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
29	1986	17	0	17	100.0%	10	2	12	83.3%	13	0	13	100.0%	44	1	45	97.8%	1989	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	7	3	10	70.0%
30	1987	15	2	17	88.2%	13	3	16	81.3%	17	2	19	89.5%	11	1	12	91.7%	1990	6	6	12	50.0%	—	—	—	—	6	4	10	60.0%	4	4	8	50.0%
31	1988	26	3	29	89.7%	17	2	19	89.5%	12	1	13	92.3%	15	1	16	93.8%	1991	6	4	10	60.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%
32	1989	28	3	31	90.3%	6	2	8	75.0%	17	1	18	94.4%	17	2	19	89.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	12	2	14	85.7%	14	3	17	82.4%	13	0	13	100.0%	13	2	15	86.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	15	2	17	88.2%	6	3	9	66.7%	15	1	16	93.8%	17	3	20	85.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	14	1	15	93.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	6	2	8	75.0%	17	4	21	81.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	15	2	17	88.2%	2	1	3	66.7%	12	2	14	85.7%	17	3	20	85.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	8	2	10	80.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	8	2	10	80.0%	10	5	15	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
45	2002	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
47	2004	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
48	2005	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	344	57	401	85.8%	226	58	284	79.6%	315	42	357	88.2%	534	71	605	88.3%	—	67	49	116	57.8%	20	24	44	45.5%	37	27	64	57.8%	88	73	161	54.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Martina Navratilova																Anne Smith
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
15	1972	1483	98.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-0.67	0–1	—	—	+0.21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1742	151.2	—	—	—	—	-211	+47	-161	52.0%	+0.01	4–5 (44%)	2–3 (40%)	100.5	-2.70	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	1961	159.8	—	—	—	—	-284	+114	-237	60.3%	+0.74	12–11 (52%)	11–4 (73%)	109.9	-9.92	1977	1634	138.6	—	—	—	—	+87	—	—	70.4%	+1.74	2–3 (40%)	—	—	+1.53
18	1975	2247	173.0	—	—	—	—	+6	-18	-381	75.8%	+1.74	14–7 (67%)	11–2 (85%)	111.4	-10.84	1978	1777	139.8	—	—	—	—	+30	—	—	68.3%	+1.39	1–2 (33%)	3–0 (100%)	101.7	+0.88
19	1976	2166	161.0	—	—	—	—	+4	-34	-73	70.4%	+1.38	11–6 (65%)	4–1 (80%)	102.0	-6.41	1979	1849	152.6	—	—	—	—	-9	-187	-232	48.5%	-0.04	13–9 (59%)	7–6 (54%)	108.4	-3.77
20	1977	2251	173.4	—	—	—	—	+102	-69	-110	79.0%	+2.21	7–7 (50%)	10–5 (67%)	100.7	-8.80	1980	1866	144.9	—	—	—	—	-31	-177	-216	47.8%	-0.08	6–4 (60%)	4–5 (44%)	101.9	-5.69
21	1978	2434	178.4	—	—	—	—	+35	-307	-96	84.1%	+2.77	15–2 (88%)	5–10 (33%)	104.2	-6.56	1981	1936	153.7	—	—	—	—	+39	-231	-156	57.9%	+0.56	9–9 (50%)	5–9 (36%)	98.6	-4.67
22	1979	2440	178.7	—	—	—	—	+37	-222	-63	84.3%	+2.59	11–3 (79%)	7–2 (78%)	102.8	-4.63	1982	1899	156.9	—	—	—	—	+43	-216	-37	60.2%	+0.58	5–8 (38%)	4–3 (57%)	97.2	-0.82
23	1980	2367	177.3	—	—	—	—	+175	-69	-15	82.0%	+2.50	17–6 (74%)	13–3 (81%)	101.9	-4.48	1983	1898	139.9	—	—	—	—	+42	—	—	51.1%	+0.02	5–2 (71%)	1–2 (33%)	100.5	-2.37
24	1981	2423	179.0	—	—	—	—	+104	-134	-12	80.4%	+2.47	16–11 (59%)	7–9 (44%)	93.9	-8.43	1984	1875	92.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.25	—	0–1	—	-0.29
25	1982	2539	179.0	—	—	—	—	+107	-124	-87	90.0%	+3.08	13–3 (81%)	12–4 (75%)	104.0	-2.79	1985	1900	131.1	—	—	—	—	—	-248	-3	64.5%	+0.90	3–0 (100%)	2–0	—	-1.34
26	1983	2638	183.0	—	—	—	—	+115	-236	-76	94.9%	+3.91	7–1 (88%)	5–0 (100%)	105.4	-2.30	1986	1719	120.9	—	—	—	—	+23	-56	—	40.9%	-0.36	2–2 (50%)	1–1	—	+0.98
27	1984	2649	177.2	—	—	—	—	+103	-152	-65	94.0%	+3.48	7–2 (78%)	7–1 (88%)	103.4	-1.21	1987	1786	131.9	—	—	—	—	+7	—	+60	60.0%	+0.69	4–3 (57%)	0–1	—	+0.68
28	1985	2595	177.6	—	—	—	—	+45	-39	+99	90.1%	+3.06	10–3 (77%)	9–4 (69%)	101.4	-1.95	1988	1778	135.5	—	—	—	—	+14	—	—	50.0%	+0.21	1–1	0–2	—	-0.68
29	1986	2634	182.2	—	—	—	—	+69	-119	+83	91.0%	+3.03	12–2 (86%)	14–2 (88%)	107.4	-2.24	1989	1851	140.5	—	—	—	—	-6	—	—	58.3%	+0.50	3–1 (75%)	3–1 (75%)	105.0	-0.03
30	1987	2527	176.8	—	—	—	—	+116	-43	+190	85.7%	+2.83	3–2 (60%)	7–4 (64%)	99.6	-3.06	1990	1828	147.1	—	—	—	—	-8	—	+19	53.7%	+0.49	3–4 (43%)	5–3 (63%)	98.2	-1.19
31	1988	2456	176.7	—	—	—	—	+130	+15	+223	85.5%	+2.93	10–3 (77%)	3–5 (38%)	94.4	-2.10	1991	1822	132.5	—	—	—	—	0	—	—	60.7%	+0.46	1–1	3–1 (75%)	—	+0.30
32	1989	2425	176.2	—	—	—	—	+96	-16	+175	86.5%	+2.82	7–4 (64%)	9–1 (90%)	98.0	-2.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	2323	174.5	—	—	—	—	+99	+62	+414	84.5%	+2.88	6–5 (55%)	5–3 (63%)	94.9	-0.34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	2322	172.3	—	—	—	—	+106	+3	+333	79.3%	+2.24	10–4 (71%)	9–5 (64%)	101.2	-1.85	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	2328	175.0	—	—	—	—	+97	—	+412	77.5%	+2.13	6–6 (50%)	10–0 (100%)	98.4	-1.40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	2265	172.8	—	—	—	—	+97	-12	+351	79.2%	+2.30	9–3 (75%)	5–2 (71%)	100.2	-1.33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	2074	161.5	—	—	—	—	+133	+37	+402	64.9%	+1.41	12–8 (60%)	5–4 (56%)	92.1	-1.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
45	2002	2052	102.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	+0.50	1–1	—	—	-0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
47	2004	1941	100.2	+0.20	-0.26	1.142	52.8%	—	+91	—	33.3%	-0.50	0–2	—	—	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
48	2005	1911	97.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.67	0–1	—	—	+0.08	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2680	180.0	+0.20	-0.26	1.142	52.8%	+78	-38	+49	81.7%	+2.48	220–109 (67%)	170–74 (70%)	105.4	-5.25	—	2051	154.3	—	—	—	—	+14	-189	-73	54.9%	+0.38	58–49 (54%)	38–35 (52%)	106.1	-4.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Martina Navratilova's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Chris Evert	44	38	82	Nov 13, 1988	H2H
Pam Shriver	39	3	42	Mar 28, 1992	H2H
Hana Mandlikova	27	8	35	Aug 12, 1989	H2H
Zina Garrison	33	1	34	Nov 7, 1993	H2H
Wendy Turnbull	30	4	34	Feb 19, 1988	H2H

Anne Smith's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Martina Navratilova	1	21	22	Feb 16, 1991	H2H
Tracy Austin	1	9	10	Feb 18, 1983	H2H
Pam Shriver	4	5	9	Nov 10, 1989	H2H
Wendy Turnbull	1	8	9	Apr 30, 1983	H2H
Mary Lou Piatek	7	1	8	Feb 14, 1991	H2H